Abstract

This paper aims to better understand the performance differences between FPGAs and GPUs. We intentionally begin with a widely used GPU-friendly benchmark suite, Rodinia, and port 15 of the kernels onto FPGAs using HLS C. Then we propose an analytical model to compare their performance. We find that for 6 out of the 15 ported kernels, today's FPGAs can provide comparable performance or even achieve better performance than the GPU, while consuming an average of 28% of the GPU power. Besides lower clock frequency, FPGAs usually achieve a higher number of operations per cycle in each customized deep pipeline, but lower effective parallel factor due to the far lower off-chip memory bandwidth. With 4x more memory bandwidth, 8 out of the 15 FPGA kernels are projected to achieve at least half of the GPU kernel performance.

Citation

Acknowledgment

This work is funded by the Center for Domain-Specific Computing and Center for Future Architectures Research. We also thank Falcon Computing for open-sourcing the memory coalescing APIs.

Team Members